SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2171

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
The State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Pankaj Kumar Sohani[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBODH ABHYANKAR ON THE 10th OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 56784 of 2025 SUNIL Versus THE STATE OF M. P. AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Pankaj Kumar Sohani - Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Surendra Singh Alawa -Govt. Adv. appearing on behalf of Advocate General.

None for the respondent no.2/victim.

ORDER

1] They are heard. Perused the case diary/challan papers.

2] This is the applicant's first bail application filed under Section

483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, as he / she is implicated in connection with Crime No.133/2025, registered at Police Station Bagh, Tehsil Kukshi, District- Dhar (MP) for offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 96, 127(4), 65(1), 351(3), 64(2)(m)of the B.N.S., and Sections 5(L)6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant is in custody since 20.07.2025.

3] The allegation against the applicant is of abduction and rape.

4] Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the age of the prosecutrix is disputed, and she left on her own volition with the applicant and resided with him for around one month as his wife, which is also stated by her in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top