SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2175

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Usha Bai – Appellant
Versus
Kale Kha – Respondent


Advocates:
Rahul Yadav,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI

th

ON THE 10 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 2345 of 2021 USHA BAI AND OTHERS Versus KALE KHA AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Rahul Yadav - Advocate for the appellants.

Shri Anil Kumar Goyal - Advocate for the respondent No. 3.

ORDER Feeling aggrieved by the impugned award dated 17.05.2019 passed in Claim Case No. 57/2018 (Ushabai & Anr. vs. Kale Khan & Ors.) whereby an amount of Rs.6,34,800/- has been awarded by the learned Claims Tribunal.

02. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that income of the deceased has been guessed to Rs.4000/- per month only whereas if the circular prevailing under Minimum Wages Act on the date of accident has been taken into account, income should have been Rs.6,474/- per month. He further submits that looking to the age of the deceased 20 years and was bachelor, 40% of the income should have been awarded in the head of future prospects and 1 & 1/2 will be deducted in the head of personal expenses as directed in the case of Smt. Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, (2009) 6 SCC 121. On these submissions, learned counsel prays for enhancement.

03. Per con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top