SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2239

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Nitesh Singh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Siddharth Datt[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA

th

ON THE 10 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 388 of 2026 NITESH SINGH THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Satyam Rai - Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Veer Vikrant Singh - Dy. A.G. for the respondents/State.

ORDER Case diary is available.

2. This application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/438 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.564/2025, registered at Police Station Ashoka Garden, Bhopal, District Bhopal for offences punishable under Section 69 of BNSS.

3. It is submitted by counsel for applicant that complainant is a major and married woman. In the FIR itself, she has stated that she got married in the year 2015 and her divorce case is pending and she is residing in Bhopal for the last 6-7 years. It is alleged that on 21.09.2025, she met with the applicant in Bansal Club where the applicant promised to marry her and committed rape on her. It is submitted that according to the FIR, the applicant had physical relationship with the complainant on 2-3 occasions. It is submitted that undisputedly th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top