SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2253

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Komal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Rajnish Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH WRIT PETITION No. 29140 of 2021 KOMAL AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Mudit Goswami - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Sanjay Kushwah - Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 to

6/State.

Shri Himanshu Pathak - Advocate for respondents No.7 & 8.

Reserved on : 05/02/2026 Delivered on : 10/02/2026 ORDER Heard on the question of admission and final disposal with the consent of parties.

The instant writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeks the following reliefs:

"(a) That, the respondent may kindly be directed to consider the petitioners representation regarding issuing the bhooswami right certificate/patta in the light of the provision as provided under Section 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Prayojan Ke Liye Upayog Ki Ja Rahi Dakhal Rahit Bhoomi Par Bhoomiswami Adhikaron Ka Pradan Kiya Jana (Vishesh Upabandh) Adhiniyam, 1984.

(b) That, the respondent be restrain the respondent to not to the dispossessed the petitioner from their land.

(c) That, any other just and proper relief, warranting under the facts and circumstances of the case be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top