SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2260

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ashish Bansal – Appellant
Versus
M.P.State Agriculture Marketing Board – Respondent


Advocates:
Jitendra Sharma,Abhishek Parashar,Kiran Upadhyay,N,S.P.Jain

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH WRIT PETITION No. 865 of 2012 ASHISH BANSAL Versus M.P.STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (M.P.) AND OTHERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Appearance:

Shri Nikhil Bhatele – Advocate for petitioner.

Shri Shyam Prakash Jain – Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.

Shri Sanjay Singh Kushwaha – Government Advocate for respondent No.3/State.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserved on : 20.01.2026 Deliveredon : 10.02.2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORDER

1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is finally heard.

2. The instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the RRC (Revenue Recovery Certificate)/(demand notice) issued to the petitioner under Section 146 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (hereinafter referred as to “the Code of 1959”) for recovery of the dues of respondent No.2, i.e., Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top