SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2262

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vimlesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Mukesh Mishra,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 10 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1254 of 2011 VIMLESH YADAV AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Kamlesh Kumar Yadav - Advocate for appellants.

Shri SantoshYadav - Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER This Criminal Appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the appellants, challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 25.05.2011 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar, District Sagar (M.P.), whereby appellant No.1, Vimlesh Yadav, was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 326 and 506-II of the Indian Penal Code, whereas appellant No.2, Naresh, and appellant No.3, Anil @ Annu Yadav, were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 326/34 and 506-II of the Indian Penal Code. Each of the appellants was sentenced to undergo four years’ rigorous imprisonment and one year’s rigorous imprisonment, respectively, with a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, with default stipulation.

2. The brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that on

17.05.2009 at about 07:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top