SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2264

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Raju Kushwaha – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Mukesh Pandey, H.S. Verma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 10 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 395 of 2009 RAJU KUSHWAHA AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Mukesh Pandey - Advocate for appellant.

Shri Atma Ram Bain - Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER This Criminal Appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the appellants challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28.01.2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Panna, District Panna (M.P.), whereby the appellants were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 325/34 and 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and simple imprisonment for one month respectively along with fine, with default stipulations.

2. Brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the incident in question occurred in the year 2008 at village Magraila Khurd. The prosecution case reveals that the dispute between the parties arose out of a petty and trivial issue relating to taking of vegetables, which suddenly escalated into a qu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top