SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2269

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Virendra Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Chetan Kanungo[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA

th

ON THE 9 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4968 of 2026 VIRENDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Mr. Rishikesh Kumar - Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Atul Kumar Sharma - Govt. Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER This is first application filed by the applicant under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. for grant of bail relating to Crime No.107/2025 registered at Civil Lines, Morena for the offence under Sections 8(20) of N.D.P.S. Act.

Allegation against the present applicant is that he was found under possession of 3098 KG Ganja, for which he was not having any valid license.

Learned counsel for the applicant/accused argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. He has not committed any offense. He has been in custody since 13.03.2025. The investigation is complete and the charge-sheet has been filed. Since the contraband has already been seized, there is no requirement for further custodial interrogation of the applicant. It is further submitted that the applicant is merely the driver of the vehicle from which the ganja was allegedly seized. Further

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top