SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2308

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Kishore Samrite – Appellant
Versus
M.P. State Election Commission – Respondent


Advocates:
Shivendra Pandey,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL

th

ON THE 9 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 ELECTION PETITION No. 9 of 2024 KISHORE SAMRITE Versus M.P. STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Shivendra Pandey with Shri Abhimanyu Chauhan - Advocates for petitioner.

Shri G.S. Baghel with Shri K.K. Raidas - Advocates for respondent 3. Shri Dayaram Vishwakarma - Government Advocate for respondents

2 & 4.

ORDER Heard on I.A.No.15308/2025, which is an application under Order 7 Rule 11(a) of CPC filed on behalf of the respondent 3.

2. Supporting the order of rejection of nomination form, learned counsel for the respondent 3 submits that since on the date of submission of nomination form, the petitioner was not eligible, therefore, no illegality is there in the order of rejection and the petitioner has no cause of action to file instant election petition, hence the petition deserves to be rejected/dismissed.

3. This Election Petition has been preferred by the petitioner challenging rejection of the petitioner's nomination form.

4. Undisputedly, the petitioner submitted his nomination form on

27.10.2023 for the post of Member of Legislative Assembly, wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top