SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2310

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Tanmay Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sankalp Kochar,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR CRR No. 4779 of 2023 (TANMAY KUMAR SHARMA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS )

Dated : 09-02-2026 Shri Vivek Kumar Choudhary - Advocate (through V.C) Ms. Vipra Kochar Advocate for the applicant.

Ms. Shikha Baghel - Advocate for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

Shri Pramod Choubey - Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State.

This case was reserved for orders on 3/2/2026. While perusing the file for dictating the order, it is seen that the case has to be released and arguments have to be heard again for the reasons that on certain aspect of the Revision both the parties did not argue the main ground of Revision are:

(i) This Revision is directed against the order dated 14.8.2023 passed in S.T No. 1117/2019 passed by learned III Additional Judge to the First Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal (Crime No. 356/2019) – State v. Tanmay Sharma. By the impugned order the learned Trial Court has framed charges against accused Tanmay Sharma for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C and 66-C and 66-D of Information and Technology Act, 2008.

(ii) The order was challenged on the ground that the above mentioned Sections are not attracted as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top