Don't Become Artificial Lawyers: Judges Warn on AI
10 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Warns Young Lawyers on Baseless PILs
10 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Extends Tribunal Tenures Amid Concerns
10 Mar 2026
Long Relationship and Roka Ceremony Justify Anticipatory Bail in Rape on False Promise Case: Delhi High Court
10 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Rejects Kalita's Diary Reconstruction Plea
10 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Closes Contempt Against Shukla After Apology
10 Mar 2026
Delhi Court Grants Sharjeel Imam 10-Day Interim Bail
10 Mar 2026
Mere Possession of Mobile Phone in Exam Hall Attracts Category-3 UFM Penalty Without Benefit of Doubt: Karnataka High Court
10 Mar 2026
NCLAT Excludes EPF Dues from Liquidation Estate
10 Mar 2026
Delhi HC Stays Trial Remarks in Excise Policy Case
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Manorama Sharma – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT
ON THE 9 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 2651 of 2015 MANORAMA SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR AND OTHERS Appearance:
None for petitioner.
Ms. Smrati Sharma - learned Government Advocate for respondent/State.
Shri Praveen Kumar Newaskar - learned counsel for respondent No.2.
ORDER This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-
"(i) Respondents be directed to cancel the modal answersheet of SET D of question paper of the examination, so far as it relates to the questions no. 3, 10, 50, 78, 127, 140, 160 & 175 attempted by the petitioner absolutely correct, and accordingly, issue a rev
Judicial review in matters of academic evaluation is limited, and courts should defer to expert opinions unless there are specific provisions allowing for re-evaluation.
Point of Law : Law that compassion sympathy or claim on basis of assessment cannot be permitted as entire examination process is derailed because some candidates are disappointed or dissatisfied or p....
Point of Law : if a statute, Rule or Regulation governing an examination does not permit re-evaluation or scrutiny of an answer sheet (as distinct from prohibiting it) then the Court may permit re-ev....
The court upheld that key answers in examinations are presumed correct unless candidates clearly demonstrate errors; judicial interference in academic matters is limited and should respect expert opi....
Point of Law : Practice of calling for answer scripts/answer sheets and thereafter to order re-evaluation and that too in absence of any specific provision in relevant rules for re-evaluation and tha....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article