SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2335

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Tekchand Jain – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr. – Respondent


Advocates:
Shivendra Sing Raghuvansi,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT th ON THE 9 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 1564 of 2015 TEKCHAND JAIN AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR. AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Rabindra Kumar Mishra - Advocate for petitioner.

Shri Prabhat Pateriya – Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

This petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, has been filed seeking the following relief (s):-

“(i) That, the order Annexure P/1 & P/2 be quashed with a further direction to restore the pay fixation made by the district authority in compliance of the Hon’ble Court order from the dated of confirmation.

(ii) That, the recovery imposed by the order annexure P/1 & P/2 be quashed.

(iii) That, the other relief doing justice including cost be awarded.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are aggrieved by the arbitrary action of the respondent authority in withdrawing the benefit of Adhyapak Samvarg granted to the petitioners just after completion of the probation period of three years, as per the decision taken by the authority in light of the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top