SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2337

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Heera Lal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH WRIT PETITION No. 6125 of 2014 HEERA LAL AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Appearance:

Shri Kamal Kumar Jain – Advocate with Shri Narottam Sharma – Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Sanjay Singh Kushwahaa – Government Advocate respondents/State.

Shri Ruchil Jain and Shri Upendra Yadav – Advocates for proposed Intervenors.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserved on : 03.02.2026 Pronounced on : 09.02.2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORDER

1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is finally heard.

2. The instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India claims following reliefs:-

"(i). That the order annexure P/1 be held to be not enforceable in view of enforcement of the Repeal Act as possession has not been taken away and the entire proceedings under Act 1976 may be quashed by virtue of operation of Repeal Act.

(ii)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top