SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2355

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Gyanwati – Appellant
Versus
Arjun Patel – Respondent


Advocates:
Durgesh Kumar Singrore,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL ON THE 6th OF FEBRUARY, 2026 SECOND APPEAL No. 296 of 2026 SMT. GYANWATI AND OTHERS Versus ARJUN PATEL AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Durgesh Kumar Singrore - Advocate for the appellants. Shri Shakti Prakash Pandey - Advocate for the respondent 1. Shri Rezi Mathai - Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent 3.

ORDER This second appeal has been preferred by the appellants/plaintiffs challenging the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2024 passed by 5th District Judge, Mandla in RCA no.8/2023 reversing the judgment and decree dated 23.12.2022 passed by 3rd Civil Judge Senior Division, Mandla in regular civil suit no.800045/2016 whereby Trial Court decreed the appellants/plaintiffs’ suit filed for declaration of title, for declaring the sale deed null and void and for issuance of permanent injunction, but upon filing civil appeal by the defendant 1-Arjun Patel, First Appellate Court set aside the judgment and decree passed by Trial Court and finding the Trial Court to have no pecuniary jurisdiction, returned the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 CPC for filing the same before the competent Family Court.

2.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top