SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2376

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajneesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Aditya Ahiwasi[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 6 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. PETITION No. 6880 of 2025 RAJNEESH KUMAR AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Aditya Ahiwasi - Advocate for the Petitioner.

Shri Mukund Agrawal - Government Advocate for the Respondent No.1.

Shri Surendra Patel - Advocate for the Respondent No.5.

ORDER By way of the present Petition, challenge is made to the Order dated

05.08.2024 passed by the Trial Court whereby the Trial Court has considered the application to sue as indigent person under Order 33 Rule 2 of C.P.C and decided the same without issuing notice to the defendants but only after hearing the State and after issuing notice to the Revenue authorities.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has raised a singular contention that the enquiry which was carried out in absence of the Petitioner/defendant was an incomplete enquiry because certain properties in the name of the Plaintiff which he had purchased by sale deeds which have now been placed on record before this Court were suppressed by him in his application to sue as indigent person which include one property of the Plai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top