SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2382

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Umar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Siddharth Datt[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR CRA No. 9565 of 2025 (UMAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH )

Dated :06-02-2026 Shri Manish Datt - Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Siddharth Datt - Advocate for the appellant.

Shri Mukesh Shukla - Government Advocate for the State of M.P.

Shri Jil Sharma - Advocate for the complainant through V.C.

Shri Vaibhav Dharpure - Advocate for the complainant present in the court.

Heard on the question of admission.

The appeal is admitted for final hearing.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that compromise has taken place between the parties.

This appeal is filed against the judgment dated 19th September

2025 passed by 21st Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal in S.T. No.497 of 2016 (State of M.P. Vs. Mohd. Uber and others). Chandu Sharma has expired during trial.

Vide Para -115 of the judgment learned trial court has acquitted the accused Ijhar, Mohd. Uber and Rishab Soni have been acquitted from the charge under Section 419/120-B, 420/120-B, 467/120-B, 468/120-B and Section 471/120-B of IPC.

The present appellant- Umar has been convicted and sentenced as below :-

It is seen from Para-127 of the judgment that the accused was taken in custody b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top