SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2383

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mp Real Estate Regulatory Authrority – Appellant
Versus
Briddhi Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Sameer Kumar Shrivastava[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

th

ON THE 6 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 7743 of 2025 MP REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHRORITY Versus BRIDDHI REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sameer Kumar Shrivastava - learned Counsel for petitioner.

Shri Raja Girraj Sharma- learned Counsel for respondents.

ORDER The instant misc. appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act of 2016"), challenging the order dated 25.06.2025 passed in Appeal No. 60 of 2022 by the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Bhopal (hereinafter referred to as the "Appellate Tribunal"), whereby the Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by respondents No.1 and 2, by setting aside the order dated 29.04.2022 passed by the appellant/the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (in short "RERA").

2. A few facts necessary for adjudication of this appeal are that the appellant is a statutory authority constituted under Section 20 of the aforesaid Act of 2016. The order challenged in this appeal was passed on 25.06.2025, but it was received in the office of the appellan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top