SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2385

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ajay Patel – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sankalp Kochar,Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT

th

ON THE 6 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 39098 of 2025 AJAY PATEL Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sankalp Kochar - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri B.D. Singh - Additional Advocate General for the respondent/State.

None for respondent No.2, though served.

ORDER This is first application filed by the applicant under Section 483(3) of the BNSS for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.2 by trial Court vide impugned order dated 23.08.2025 (Annexure C/1) in connection with FIR/Crime No.374/2024 registered at Police Station Omti, District Jabalpur for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 419, 467, 468, 471,384, 386, 506, 506 r/w 120-B, 34 of I.P.C.

2. As per prosecution story, an F.I.R. was lodged by the complainant/applicant wherein it has been stated that he is engaged in construction and contractual work. It has been stated in the F.I.R. that in the month of July 2023, one Jameel, the brother-in-law of Mehmood (who is the brother of Abdul Razzak), approached the complainant and informed him that a plot of land admeasuring 2,587 sq. ft. at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top