SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2421

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Suresh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Rohit Sohgaura[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH ON THE 5th OF FEBRUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 484 of 2026 SURESH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Rohit Sohgaura - Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Mukesh Shukla - Government Advocate for State of M.P.

ORDER Heard on the question of admission.

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties this revision is heard finally.

2. This revision is filed against the order dated 31.12.2025 passed by learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S.. Act, Katni in SC N.D.P.S. 63 of

2025.

3. The aforesaid order has been challenged on the ground that the applicant has no connection with the alleged crime and he has been falsely implicated. No cogent reason has been assigned for rejecting the application for Supurdnama of the Pick Up No. M.P.-18-Z.A. 9627.

4. It is further submitted that the entire reading of the prosecution case/charge-sheet it is clear that co- accused was carrying contraband substance and he was travelling as a passenger to travel from Amiliya to Kamore. The applicant was unaware regarding the fact that co- accused was carrying contraband substance, hence this on this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top