SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2448

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Satendra – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
,Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

th

ON THE 5 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 2739 of 2026 SATENDRA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Arshad Ali M. Haque - Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms Kalpana Parmar - Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.

ORDER The present petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief:-

"It is, therefore, prayed that the court may kindly be pleased to allow this application of applicant under section 482 of Cr.P.C. for Fair investigation and also directed to submit additional challan with respect to u/s 117 of Bhartiya Nayay Sahinta is equivalent of Indian penal code section 325 (voluntarily causing grievous heard) in connection with the crime No. 91/25 p.s. Endori District Bhind whereby offence was registered against the respondent No. 5 to 8 offences U/s 115(2), 296, 351(3), 3(5), 118(1) of B.N.S. 2023."

So far as the prayer relating to fair investigation is concerned, it is well settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. [(2008) 2 SCC 409] and Aleque Padamsee v. Union of India [(2007) 6 SCC 171

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top