2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2461
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Abrar @ Sahil – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 60087/2025
Imityaz Ahmad Behna,Advocate General[R-1]
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:3733
1 MCRC-60087-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR
th
ON THE 5 OF FEBRUARY, 2026
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 60087 of 2025
ABRAR @ SAHIL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Appearance:
Shri Imityaz Ahmad Behna, Advocate for the applicant.
Shri Ayushyaman Choudhary, Govt. Advocate for the respondent
No.1/State.
Ms. Mansi Kushwah, Advocate for the respondent No.2[OBJ].
ORDER
I.A. No.1722/2026 is an application filed by the applicant for taking
additional document on record.
Considered. Prayer accepted.
The I.A. No.1722/2026 is allowed. The documents are taken on
record.
This first application has been filed by the applicant under Section 483
of BNSS, 2023 for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.650/2025,
registered at Police Station - Alot, District Ratlam(M.P.) for offence
punishable under Sections 64(2)(m), 137(2), 96, 351(3), 296, 3(5), 70(2) of
BNS, 2023 and Section 5(L)/6 of POCSO Act. Applicant is in judicial
custody since 18.10.2025.
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PREETHA NAIR
Signing time: 05-02-2026
17:49:05
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:3733
2 MCRC-60087-2025
Heard the arguments.
Perused the grounds for grant of bail stated in the application, case
diary and the relevant material on record.
Learned counsel for the applicant, in addition to the grounds
mentioned in the application, submits that the applicant is falsely implicated
in the alleged offence under pressure of family members of the victim. It is a
case of romantic relationship between two youngsters. When their
relationship was revealed to the brother of the victim, false allegation of rape
is levelled against the applicant. No offence, as alleged, is committed by the
applicant. The DNA report exonerates the applicant and falsifies the
allegation of sexual assault. Learned counsel further referring to the evidence
of victim (PW1) and her mother (PW-2) recorded before the trial Court
contends that they did not support the accusation. The fate of prosecution is
apparent. The determination of age during investigation is doubtful.
Applicant has clean past, with family roots. There is no history of evading
process of law. There is no likelihood of tampering with remaining evidence
by the applicant for the reason that the material prosecution witnesses have
been examined. Jail incarceration is causing hardship to the young applicant.
Applicant is ready to cooperate in trial. The alleged offence is not heinous or
brutal in nature affecting society at larger.
Per contra, learned counsel for the State ably assisted by learned
counsel for the respondent/objector opposes the application on the ground of
gravity of alleged offence. However, after going through the case diary, he
fairly states that no criminal antecedent is reported against the applicant.
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PREETHA NAIR
Signing time: 05-02-2026
17:49:05
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:3733
3 MCRC-60087-2025
Applicant is aged around 24 years and is labourer by profession.
As per accusation on record, victim aged around 17 years reported to
P.S. Alot on 18.10.2025 that she met Abrar @ Sahil(applicant) two years ago
in a marriage function. They started communicating with each other. Sahil
used to visit her at Alot. On 14.10.2025, around 11.00 in the night, Sahil @
Abrar came to her house in a car. Sahil and his friend Mohin @
Mohinuddain took her to a secluded place on Shankarji Road. They parked
the car. Sahil proposed to marry her and committed rape with her. Thereafter,
Sahil and Mohin left her at home. Sahil started threatening to make her
videos viral. Sahil sent a message to her brother that he has obscene photos
and videos of victim. When her brother confronted her, she narrated the
incident and came to report. On such allegation, P.S. Alot registered FIR for
offence punishable under Sections 64(2)(m), 137(2), 96, 351(3), 296, 3(5),
70(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 5l/6 of POCSO Act. The victim (PW1) and
her moth