SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2530

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Omprakash Solanki,Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR

th

ON THE 4 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 5694 of 2026 RAHUL Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Omprakash Solanki - Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Surendra Gupta - Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State.

ORDER This first application has been filed by applicant under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 for grant of regular bail in connection with Crime No.306/2024 registered at Police Station Kanad, District Agar Malwa(M.P.) for offence punishable under Sections, 309(4), 310(2), 238, 61(2)(a), 312, 111 of BNS, 2023, Section 25(1a) and 27 of Arms Act and Section 3/181 and 5/180 of Motor Vehicle Act. Applicant is in custody since 05.01.2025. Complainant - Bharat Yadav (PW-1) and the injured eye-witness Shankar Singh (PW-2) have been examined before the trial Court.

Heard the arguments.

Perused the grounds for grant of bail stated in the application, case diary and the relevant material on record.

Learned counsel for the applicant, in addition to the grounds mentioned in the application, submits that the applicant is falsely implicated in the alleged

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top