SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2563

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anupam Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Fariyad Ansari – Respondent


Advocates:
Dharmendra Singh Chauhan[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

th

ON THE 4 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. PETITION No. 6774 of 2025 ANUPAM MITTAL AND OTHERS Versus FARIYAD ANSARI Appearance:

Shri Dharmendra Singh Chauhan - Advocate for petitioners.

Shri Vivek Kumar Mishra- Advocate for respondent.

ORDER This Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners (defendants) challenging the order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the First District Judge, Sheopur, in Regular Civil Suit No. 138-A of 2023.

2. In brief, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract, permanent injunction, and recovery of amount, based on a sale agreement dated 25.01.2023. The agreement was executed between the plaintiff and the defendants- petitioners for the sale of agricultural land for a total consideration of Rs.1,50,00,000/-. The plaintiff paid an advance of Rs. 10,00,000/-, but the defendants failed to execute the sale deed. The petitioners filed a written statement denying the plaint averments and raised an objection regarding the admissibility of unregistered sale

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top