SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2589

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sanjay Jain – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Greeshm Jain,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI

th

ON THE 4 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 38623 of 2024 SANJAY JAIN Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sankalp Kochar, Shri Greeshm Jain and Shri Vipul Vardhan Jain - Advocates for the applicant.

Shri H.S. Ruprah - Additional Advocate General alongwith Shri Ajeet Rawat - Govt. Advocate for respondent/State.

Shri Vivek Ranjan Pandey and Shri Rohit Raghuwanshi - Advocates for respondent no.2.

WITH MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 36900 of 2024 SANJAY JAIN Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sankalp Kochar, Shri Greeshm Jain and Shri Vipul Vardhan Jain - Advocates for the applicant.

Shri H.S. Ruprah - Additional Advocate General alongwith Shri Ajeet Rawat - Govt. Advocate for respondent/State.

Shri Vivek Ranjan Pandey and Shri Rohit Raghuwanshi - Advocates for respondent no.2.

RESERVED ON : 09.01.2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 04.02.2026 ORDER This order shall govern the disposal of MCrC No.38623/2024 and MCrC No.36900/2024 as these petitions arise out of same case being Criminal Case No.440/2023.

2. These petitions have been instituted by the petitioners, wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top