SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2590

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Pawan Sood – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Dr. Anuvad Shrivastava,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 4 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 WRIT APPEAL No. 1297 of 2024 PAWAN SOOD Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Dr. Anuvad Shrivastava - Advocate for the appellant.

Shri Ritwik Parashar - Government Advocate for the respondent No.1/State.

ORDER Per: Justice Vivek Rusia The present writ appeal is filed against the order dated 15.02.2024, passed in M.Cr.C. No.35565/2021 (Smt. Renu Gond and Ors. Vs. The State of M.P. and Ors.) by the Single Bench of this Court.

2. The office has objected to the maintainability of this writ appeal filed under Section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the learned Single Bench of this Court has a concurrent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C as well as Article 226 of the Constitution of India in respect of quashment of FIR as well as criminal proceedings. Therefore, the writ appeal should be entertained, even if the petition was filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023.

4. In support of his contention, learned co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top