SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2637

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mayaram – Appellant
Versus
Shrimali Sitabai And 5 Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
Manoj Manav,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PAVAN KUMAR DWIVEDI

th

ON THE 4 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 2051 of 2014 MAYARAM Versus SHRIMATI SITABAI AND 5 OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Navneet Kishore Verma - Advocate for the appellant.

Shri Bharat Yadav - Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3.

Heard on - 17.11.2025 Pronounced on - 04.02.2026 ORDER This appeal has been filed by the defendant under the provisions of Order 43 Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order of remand dated 27.02.2013 passed by the First Appellate Court in Civil Appeal No. 23A/2011.

Facts of the case, in short, are as under :

2. The plaintiffs who are the wife and sons of Mayaram had filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction with respect to the agricultural land situated in Patwari Halka No. 24 bearing survey No. 370/1 admeasuring 2.04 hectare of village Jalwa, Tehsil Ghatia, District Ujjain. The case of the plaintiffs is that property in dispute originally belonged to Late Siddhaji who got this property from his ancestors. The husband of plaintiff No.1 and father of plaintiffs No. 2 and 3 - Mayaram is the son of Late Sidhhaji. Mayaram solemnized marriage wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top