SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2677

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ghanshyam Pandit – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Harish Chandra Tripathi,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1878 of 2024 GHANSHYAM PANDIT AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Harish Chandra Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Jayesh Yadav, counsel for the State.

Ms. Deesha Goyal, counsel for respondent no.2.

Heard on: 27.11.2025 Delivered on: 12.02.2026 ORDER This criminal revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C, is preferred being aggrieved by the order dated 07.03.2024 in RCT No.617/2021 by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sendhwa District Barwani whereby the charges under Section 498-A of IPC and under Section 4 of The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 has been framed against the revision petitioners in a case arising out of Crime No.285/2021 registered At Police Station Verla, District Barwani.

2. The revision petitioner no.1 is husband, revision petitioner no.2 is father-in-law, revision petitioner no.3 is mother-in-law, revision petitioner no.4 is brother-in-law and revision petitioner no.5 is sister-in-law of respondent no.2/complainant i.e. revision petitioner no.1 is husband of the complainant and other revision petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top