SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2693

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Abdul Kadar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Subodh Kumar Pandey[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA

th

ON THE 11 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 3041 of 2026 ABDUL KADAR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Subodh Pandey - Advocate for petitioner.

Shri Vineet Singh - Govt. Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India making a prayer to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.3-State Transport Authority of Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior (M.P.) to consider and decide the petitioner's application (Annexure P/3), as per Clause 9 of reciprocal agreement which is executed between State of Maharashtra & State of Madhya Pradesh.

2. It is a case of the petitioner that an application in respect of change of vehicle on stage carriage permit for plying the vehicle from Malegaon (Maharashtra) to Burhanpur (M.P.) has been filed by the petitioner which is pending consideration and has not been decided till date. An innocuous prayer is made to direct the respondent No.3 to consider and decide the pending application (Annexure P/3) expeditiously. The State Transport Authority, Maharashtr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top