SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2717

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Nekram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
U.K.Pal,Vinay Kumar Shah,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT

th

ON THE 10 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 5815 of 2010 NEKRAM SINGH Versus STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Vinay Kumar Shah - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Sohit Mishra - Government Advocate for the respondents/State.

ORDER This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-

"(i) That, the order of Respondent No.2 (Annexure P/1) based on communication order dated 15.04.2010 of the Respondent No.3 may kindly be quashed.

(ii) That, the Petitioners may kindly be allowed to receive back the illegal recovery done by the Respondent no.4 and accordingly, action of the Respondents may please be saddled and Respondents be directed to refund Rs.39,907/- with interest.

(iii) That, the Petitioner may kindly be allowed to get the interest on the amount illegally recovered by the Respondents alongwith the Respondents may please also be saddled by the exemplary damages of Rs.10,000/- and be awarded to the Petitioner.

(iv) That, any other relief which the Court deems fit may please be granted, in the interest of justice.

(v) Cost of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top