SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2726

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Chhotelal & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Karan Singh & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
Jai Prakash Mishra,Smt.Abha Mishra,Gurudutt Sharma, Smt.Purnima Nigam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR SA No. 233 of 2003 (CHHOTELAL & ANR. Vs KARAN SINGH & ORS. )

Dated :09-02-2026 Shri Jai Prakash Mishra - Advocate for LRs of appellant.

Shri Gurudutt Sharma - Advocate for respondents.

Heard on I.A. No. 6959/2024, an application under Order 22 Rules 3 and 9 of the CPC, and I.A. No. 6953/2024, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

It is submitted by counsel for appellant that during the pendency of the appeal, appellant No.1, Chhotelal, died on 30.06.2020 and appellant No.2 died on 15.01.2016. The wife of appellant No. 1, Laxmi Devi, died on 18.07.2023 and Smt. Parvati Devi, the wife of appellant No. 2, died on 29.07.2012. The deceased appellants No.1 and 2 left behind the LRs as mentioned in I.A. No. 6959/2024 in Paras 2 and 3. It is submitted that proposed LRs of the appellants are poor persons and were not aware of the provisions of law. They were not known to the fact of the pendency of the appeal. When they came to know, the contact was made with counsel for appellants and it was informed that the appeal is pending, and thereafter necessary steps have been taken to implead the LRs of appellants No.1 and 2 and for settin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top