SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2797

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anil Pathak – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Prem Singh Bhadouria[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

th

ON THE 12 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 1411 of 2026 ANIL PATHAK AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Trishant Mishra - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Brijesh Kumar Tyagi Ga appearing on behalf of Advocate General[r-1].

ORDER By invoking inherent powers of this Court, the present petition has been preferred by petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment of FIR bearing Crime No.459/2019 registered at Police Station Thatipur, District Gwalior for offence punishable under Sections 294, 323, 324, 506 and 34 of IPC and entire consequential criminal proceedings Case No.182/2020 S.T. emanating therefrom.

2. Alongwith the petition, both the parties have filed I.A.

Nos.538/2026 and 540/2026 stating therein that the dispute between the parties has been resolved and they have entered into compromise with no intention to pursue the matter further.

3. In compliance of order passed by this Court, the factum of compromise has been verified by the Principal Registrar of this Court, who has recorded the statements of com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top