SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2862

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Geeta Prasad – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vidya Shankar Mishra,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI

th

ON THE 10 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 17016 of 2024 GEETA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Vidya Shankar Mishra - Advocate for the petitioner.

Smt. Mamta Mishra PL for the respondent/State.

Shri Akhand Pratap Singh - Advocate for the objector through V.C.

ORDER The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, “CrPC”) has been filed challenging the order dated 03.08.2023 passed by the learned Trial Court in Sessions Trial No. 3/14, whereby the application filed by the prosecution as well as accused/respondent No.2 under Section 311 CrPC were allowed and in the application filed by the respondent No.2, PW-2 Satyanarayan was directed to be recalled for further examination. The petitioner has no grievance with part of order whereby an application under section 311 of Cr.P.C filed by the prosecution has been allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that during the pendency of the trial, the prosecution moved an application under Section 311 CrPC seeking permission to produce certain documents. Initially, the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top