SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2918

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rohit – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Rakesh Kumar Sharma[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH

rd

ON THE 3 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 5786 of 2025 ROHIT Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearanc Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma - Advocate for the petitioner [P-1].

Shri Prashant Jain appearing on behalf of Advocate General[r-1].

Heard on: 07.01.2026 Delivered On: 03.02.2026 ORDER This criminal revision is preferred under Section 438 read with Section

441 of BNSS, 2023 being aggrieved by the order dated 08.09.2025 in ST No.102/2020 by Additional Session Judge, Depalpur, Indore whereby the application under Section 91 of Cr.P.c., 1973 (Annexure A/2) for summoning the documents mentioned in the application has been rejected. Simultaneously, the application under Section 231(2) of Cr.P.C., 1973 for permitting the cross-examination of the witnessed to be deferred, has also been dismissed.

2. Facts in brief are that, the revision petitioner is facing trial for the charges under Section 420 read with Section 120-B, 467 read with Section 120-B, 468 read with section 120-B, 471 read with Section 120-B and 406 read with Section 120-B of IPC in a case arising out of Crime No.153/2019 registered a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top