SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2969

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sanjay Kumar Pathak – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar Rai – Respondent


Advocates:
,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN MISC. APPEAL No. 1039 of 2018 SANJAY KUMAR PATHAK AND OTHERS Versus MANOJ KUMAR RAI AND OTHERS WITH MISC. PETITION No. 622 of 2017 MANOJ KUMAR RAI Versus SANJAY KUMAR PATHAK AND OTHERS MISC. PETITION No. 315 of 2018 MANOJ KUMAR RAI Versus SANJAY KUMAR PATHAK AND OTHERS ………………………………………………………………………………..

Appearance:

Shri T. S. Ruprah Senior Advocate with Shri Uma Shankar Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Vinod Mishra-Panel Lawyer for respondent-State. Shri Kapil Rohra-Advocate for the private respondents ………………………………………………………………………………..

(O R D E R)

(Reserved on : 05/01/2026)

(Pronounced on:03/02/2026)

Since all the 3 cases arise out of the same judgment and decree, therefore they are being heard analogously and are being decided by this common order.

2. M.P. No. 622/2017 and MP 315/2018 have been filed under Article 227, challenging the orders dated 09-08-2017 and 18-12-2017 passed during course of the execution proceedings at the instance of the decree holder. He has challenged the interlocutory orders passed in course of the execution proceedings. By the order dated 09-08-2017, the executing cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top