HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Kashi Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P. – Respondent
WP 2959/2006
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:4383
1 WP-2959-2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH
rd
ON THE 3 OF FEBRUARY, 2026
WRIT PETITION No. 2959 of 2006
KASHI PRASAD
Versus
STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS
Appearance:
Shri Pradeep Shrivastava & Shri A.K. Jain, Advocates for the
petitioner.
Shri Sanjay Singh Kushwah - Govt. Advocate for the respondents No.
1,4, 5 & 6/State.
None for the LRs. of respondent No.2, though served.
Name of respondent No.3 stands deleted from the array of petition
vide order dated 09.01.2025.
ORDER
1. The instant writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the
Constitution of India claims following reliefs:-
"1. The orders, Annexure P-3, Annexure P-4 and Annexure
P-5 passed by Tahsildar, Sub Divisional Officer and
Commissioner respectively may kindly be quashed and the
allotment proceedings being contrary to law may kindly be
quashed and the plaintiff be declared Bhumiswami of the
land.
2. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in
the facts and circumstances of the case be allowed.
3. Cost of the petition be awarded to the petitioner."
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that land
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: VANDANA
VERMA
Signing time: 04-Feb-26
7:12:36 PM
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:4383
2 WP-2959-2006
bearing Survey No.401/1 admeasuring 6 bigha 7 biswa situated at village
Sainthra Badhai, Tehsil Porsa, District Morena was granted on patta to the
uncle of the petitioner, namely late Mataprasad, by the erstwhile Zamindar
somewhere in Samvat 2007. A civil suit was instituted by late Mataprasad
against the State seeking a decree of declaration and confirmation of
Bhumiswami rights in respect of the said land vide Civil Suit No 93-A/79
wherein, the issue as regards grant of patta of land bearing Survey No.401/1
in favour of late Mataprasad was found proved and it was also proved in the
said suit that late Mataprasad had attained the rights of Pakka Krishak in
respect of survey No.401/1. However, vide judgment and decree dated
3.8.1981, the suit was dismissed by the learned trial Court on the ground of
non-compliance of Section 57(2) of the M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959.
3. It is further submitted that subsequently, the procedure for
changing the nature of the said land was initiated by the revenue authorities
and the process of settlement of the land in favour of certain persons was
undertaken by the Tahsildar, culminating in an order dated 20.02.2001. The
said order was challenged by the petitioner by filing a first appeal before the
Sub-Divisional Officer and thereafter a second appeal before the
Commissioner, Chambal Division; however, both the appeals came to be
dismissed vide orders dated 24.09.2002 and 03.03.2006 respectively. These
orders are also under challenge in the instant writ petition.
4. The solitary argument advanced by the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner is that once the issue as regards attainment of Pakka
Krishak rights in favour of late Mataprasad stood decided in his favour in
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: VANDANA
VERMA
Signing time: 04-Feb-26
7:12:36 PM
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:4383
3 WP-2959-2006
Civil Suit No.93-A/79 (Annexure P/2), the right of the petitioner flows from
the said finding and, therefore, the respondents were not justified in making
settlement of the said land in favour of the private respondents. On the said
premise, it is contended that the petition deserves to be allowed with the
reliefs claimed therein.
5. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the State, by
referring to the return filed, submits that there nothing on record to indicate
as to whether, the petitioner herein is the successor of late Mataprasad.
Moreover, the petitioner cannot be permitted to claim or derive his rights on
findings recorded in a civil suit which ultimately stood dismissed.
Consequently, no right accrues in favour of the petitioner to question the
settlement proceedings conducted by the State authorities
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.