SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2992

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Parasram – Appellant
Versus
Karulal Gurjar – Respondent


Advocates:
Prafulla V. Bhagwat,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI

nd

ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 2511 of 2014 PARASRAM AND OTHERS Versus KARULAL GURJAR AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sachin Parmar - Advocate for the appellants.

None for respondents.

ORDER

1. This appeal has been filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 being aggrieved by the award dated 12.9.2014 passed by the learned Addl. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Neemuch (M.P.) in Claim Case No.124/2013 whereby, compensation of Rs.3,64,000/- has been awarded on account of death of Pankaj Prajapati in motor vehicle accident occurred on 29.8.2013.

2. Appellants are seeking enhancement of the impugned award on the ground of erroneous assessment of income and proper application of multiplier, incorrect deduction and inadequate award under conventional heads.

3. Brief facts of the case are that on 29th August, 2013 around 9.45 PM the deceased was met with an accident resulting grievous injuries and eventual death. FIR was registered and after investigation charge sheet was filed against the driver.

4. The claim petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act was filed by the legal r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top