SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2994

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Firoz Aliji – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwat – Respondent


Advocates:
H.C. Kohli,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 5 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 CIVIL REVISION No. 289 of 2013 FIROZ ALIJI AND OTHERS Versus BHAGWAT AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri H.C. Kohli & Shri Pramesh Jain- Advocates for the petitioners.

Shri Mukund Agrawal Government Advocate for the respondent-State.

ORDER The present petitioners are objectors in execution proceedings and are objecting to the decree dated 18.08.2004 on the ground that they are purchasers of the property and they are in possession as per valid sale deeds. The Executing Court has held that since the petitioners are strangers to the decree, therefore, they cannot maintain objection under Order 21 Rule 79 CPC and a stranger to the decree can maintain the objection only under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC. The Executing Court came to the conclusion that application under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC can be filed before the Executing Court only by the decree holder or purchaser of the property sold in execution of decree.

2. The Executing Court therefore, considered the objections of the petitioner to be under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC, but held that the objections under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC can only be ente

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top