SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3014

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajendra Kumar Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Ganeshilal Bansal – Respondent


Advocates:
Parth Dixit[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA

th

ON THE 29 OF JANUARY, 2026 SECOND APPEAL No. 3156 of 2025 RAJENDRA KUMAR BANSAL AND ANOTHER Versus GANESHILAL BANSAL Appearance:

Shri Harish Dixit - Senior Advocate, assisted by Shri S.K. Khare - Advocate for appellants.

JUDGMENT This second appeal under Section 100 of CPC has been filed against th the judgment and decree dated 29/09/2025 passed by 12 District Judge, Gwalior, in R.C.A. No. 367/2024 as well as judgment and decree dated th

24/10/2024 passed by 14 Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gwalior, in R.C.S.A. No. 2600005/2015.

2. Appellants are tenants who have lost their case from both the Courts below.

3. The facts necessary for disposal of present appeal, in short, are that respondent/plaintiff Ganeshilal Bansal filed a suit for eviction pleading inter alia that he is the owner and in possession of a double-storey building. The space marked in green color with open space was given by plaintiff to defendant No. 1 in the year 1988 on tenancy. Defendant No. 1 is the nephew of plaintiff and since he was working in the firm of plaintiff, therefore, part of the building marked as green color in th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top