SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Balchand Singhwal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Lokesh Kumar Bhatnagar,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JAI KUMAR PILLAI ON THE 28TH OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 5807 of 2019 DURGAPRASAD & THREE OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri L. C. Patne - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Pradyumna Kibe –G.A for the respondents/State.

WRIT PETITION No. 7554 of 2019 RAMPRASAD CARPENTAR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Lokesh Kumar Bhatnagar - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Pradyumna Kibe – G.A for the respondents/State.

WRIT PETITION No. 7558 of 2019 BALCHAND SINGHWAL Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Lokesh Kumar Bhatnagar - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Pradyumna Kibe – G.A for the respondents/State.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORDER

These are a bunch of writ petitions filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the common order/letter dated 02/03/2019 and 19/03/2019 issued by respondent directing that the services of persons appointed on contractual basis as Technical Assistants under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top