SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Smt. Poornima Saxena – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT th ON THE 27 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 649 of 2017 SMT. POORNIMA SAXENA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Dharmendra Singh Raghuvanshi – counsel for petitioner.

Shri Ravindra Dixit – Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

This petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, has been filed seeking the following relief (s):

“(i) That, the present petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed;

(ii) That, the impugned order dated 14.12.2016 Annexure P/1 passed by the respondent no.2 may kindly be directed to be set aside. It may kindly be further clarified that there has been no break in service for a day even right from the joining of the petitioner in the year 1987 till her retirement up to 2014, in that view of the matter the respondents have no option but to regularize the services of the petitioner especially in the facts and circumstances of the case when they permitted the petitioner to retire and aforesaid two conditions are not with her control.

(iii) That, any other just, suitable and proper relief, which this Hon’ble Court d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top