SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3030

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vijay Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
M P M K V V Com Ltd – Respondent


Advocates:
Ravi Bhargava[P-1],Ravi Jain

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT rd ON THE 23 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT APPEAL No. 184 of 2026 VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA Versus M P M K V V COM LTD AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Ravi Bhargav - Advocate for Appellant.

Shri Ravi Jain – Advocate for respondent No.2 and 3.

ORDER

As per Justice Anand Singh Bahrawat:

By way of instant appeal, filed under Section 2 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, challenge is made to the order dated 15.12.2025 passed in W.P.No.2397/2025; whereby, writ petition preferred by petitioner/appellant was dismissed claiming the benefit of full salary for the period from 25.1.2018 to 30.4.2021 during which he remained under suspension and praying for interest on the aforesaid amount.

2. In nut shell the facts giving to the instant appeal are that initially appellant was appointed on the post of Store Assistant in the Madhya Pradesh Vidhyut Mandal now know as Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidhyut Vitaran Company Ltd. (MPMKVV Com. Td) on 3.4.1982. At the relevant point of time he was working as Junior Engineer at Gwalior Division of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top