SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3059

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Shri Vikas Bhausheb Rohokale – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Shalijare Puar – Respondent
MA 5445/2025



Advocates:
Deepak Mehra[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI ON THE 21st OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 1309 of 2025 SHRIMANT MAHARAJA TUKOJI RAO PUAR RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE TRUST THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE SMT GAYATRIRAJE AND OTHERS Versus SMT. SHAILJARAJE PUAR AND OTHERS …..........................................................................................................................

Appearance:

Shri Veer Kumar Jain, learned senior counsel assisted by Shri Vinay Chandel, learned counsel for the Appellants – Defendants No. 6 & 7.

Shri Ravindra Singh Chhabra, learned senior counsel assisted by Shri Mudit Maheshwari, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1.

Shri Vijay Kumar Assudani, learned counsel for the respondents No. 2, 3 & 4.

Shri Sumeet Samvatsar, learned counsel for the respondent No.6/Defendant No. 5.

Shri Manish Sankhla, learned Government Advocate for the respondents No. 7 & 8/Defendants No. 8 & 9.

Shri Arpit Kumar Oswal, learned counsel for the respondents No. 9 to

14/Defendants No. 10 to 15.

….....................................................................................................................

MISC. APPEAL No. 990 of 2025 SMT. GAYATRIRAJE PUAR AND OTHERS Versus SMT. SHAILJARAJE PUAR AND OTHERS …..........................................................................................................................

Appearance:

Shri Vijay Kumar Assudani, learned counsel for the appellants.

Shri Ravindra Singh Chhabra, learned senior counsel assisted by Shri Mudit Maheshwari, learned counsel for the respondent(s)/caveat. Shri Sumeet Samvatsar, learned counsel for the respondent No.3.

Shri Arpit Kumar Oswal, learned counsel for the respondents No. 8 to 13.

….....................................................................................................................

MISC. APPEAL No. 3877 of 2025 SMT. SHAILAJARAJE PUAR W/O SHRI C. NARAYAN Versus SMT. GAYATRIRAJE PUAR AND OTHERS …..........................................................................................................................

Appearance:

Shri Ravindra Singh Chhabra, learned senior counsel assisted by Shri Mudit Maheshwari, learned counsel for the appellant.

Shri Vijay Kumar Assudani, learned counsel for the respondents No.1 to

3.

Shri Sumeet Samvatsar, learned counsel for the respondent No.5.

Shri Arpit Kumar Oswal, learned counsel for the respondents No. 10 to

15.

….....................................................................................................................

MISC. APPEAL No. 5445 of 2025 SHRI VIKAS BHAUSHEB ROHOKALE AND OTHERS Versus SMT. SHALIJARE PUAR AND OTHERS …..........................................................................................................................

Appearance:

Shri Arpit Kumar Oswal, learned counsel for the appellants.

Shri Ravindra Singh Chhabra, learned senior counsel assisted by Shri Mudit Maheshwari, learned counsel for the respondents.

….....................................................................................................................

ORDER

Per: Justice Binod Kumar Dwivedi Having regard to the similitude of controversy commonality of orders involved in all these Misc. Appeals, they are heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order.

02. These Misc. Appeals have been preferred by Appellants (Defendants No. 6 and Defendant No. 7, Defendants No. 1 to 3, Plaintiff and Defendant No. 10 to Defendant No. 15 respectively in RCS No.101A/2021) under Order 43 Rule 1(r) r/w Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred for short „CPC‟) assailing the impugned order dated 11.01.2025 and 28.03.2025 passed by learned Principal District Judge, Dewas in RCSA No. 101/2021 whereby the application filed by Respondent No. 1/Appellant-Plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC( I.A. No 1/2021 and I.A. No 2/2025) were allowed and the Defendants No. 1 to 7 (respondents No. 1 to 7 herein) were restrained from alienating

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top