SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3087

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Manish Patel – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vinita Phaye,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JAI KUMAR PILLAI ON THE 20TH OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 6129 of 2024 MANISH PATEL AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Ms. Dixita Gupta - Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Swati Ukhale G.A for respondents No. 1 &2 /State Shri Ashutosh Nimgaonkar - Advocate for the respondent No.3,4 & 5.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article

226 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 16/06/2023 (Annexure P/11) passed by respondent No.3, whereby the claim of the petitioners for regularization has been rejected on the ground that there exists no provision of regularization under the departmental policy and that opportunities for Samvida Karmis for regular appointment have been provided under circulars dated 05/06/2018, 20/12/2019 and

04/10/2022, which are stated to be under process.

2. The facts of the case, briefly stated, are that respondent No.3 issued an order dated 27/12/2011 (Annexure P/1) directing all District Central Cooperative Banks in the State to appoi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top