SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3097

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sanoj Sharma – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Prashant Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA YADAV

th

ON THE 19 OF JANUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 3108 of 2023 SANOJ SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Siddharth Sharma - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Vikram Pippal - Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1/State.

Shri Rajendra Singh Yadav - Advocate for respondent No.2.

ORDER The present criminal revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed challenging the order dated 26.05.2023 whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. for discharge has been dismissed by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior, in Sessions Trial No.154/2022 and charge under Sections 376(2)(n), 294, 419 and 506 Part II of IPC has been framed.

2. As per prosecution story, the prosecutrix, who is posted on the post of Assistant Professor (Contractual) in the Computer Science Engineering Department of Engineering Institute in Jiwaji University, made a complaint that for marriage purpose she created an account on matrimonial site i.e. Jeevan Sathi in the year 2013. One person namely Satyaprakash Tiwari

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top