SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3098

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Laxman Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Rajkumar Mahajan – Respondent


Advocates:
Prashant Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA

th

ON THE 19 OF JANUARY, 2026 SECOND APPEAL No. 2605 of 2022 SMT. SHANTI PRAJAPATI AND ANOTHER Versus RAJKUMAR MAHAJAN AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Yogesh Chaturvedi, Advocate for appellants.

Shri P.C.Chandil, Shri Kamal Mangal and Shri Dinesh Baghel, Advocates for respondent No.1.

Shri Dilip Awasthi, Government Advocate for respondent No.3/State.

WITH SECOND APPEAL No. 2616 of 2022 LAXMAN SINGH YADAV Versus RAJKUMAR MAHAJAN AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Siddharth Sharma, Advocate for appellant.

Shri P.C.Chandil, Shri Kamal Mangal and Shri Dinesh Baghel, Advocates for respondent No.1/caveator.

Shri Dilip Awasthi, Government Advocate for respondent No.4/State.

JUDGMENT By this common judgement, S.A. No. 2605/2022 filed by Smt. Shanti Prajapati and Smt. Sushila and S.A. No.2616/2022 filed by Laxman Singh Yadav shall be disposed of.

2. Both the appeals arise out of judgement and decree dated 16/8/2022 passed by XV District Judge, Gwalior in RCA No. 87/2021, by which the appeal has been allowed and judgement and decree dated 14/8/2021 passed by IV Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gwalior in RCSA No. 2200174A/201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top