SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3116

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
State Of M.P. – Appellant
Versus
Prahlad Singh & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate General,Madan Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR NIRANKARI

th

ON THE 14 OF JANUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 115 of 1996 STATE OF M.P.

Versus PRAHLAD SINGH & ORS. AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Yash Soni - Deputy Advocate General for the appellant/State.

None for the respondents.

ORDER Per: Justice Ajay Kumar Nirankari The instant criminal appeal has been preferred by the State against the st judgment of acquittal passed by the learned 1 Additional Sessions Judge, Damoh (M.P.) in S.T. No.95/94 whereby respondents have been acquitted from the offences punishable under Sections 304-B, 366 and 498-A of I.P.C.

2. Brief facts for adjudication of the matter are that on getting information about the death of deceased Draupadi Bai, a case under Crime No. 0 was registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Damoh. The police authority Kotwali prepared the lash panchnama and after postmortem, sent the matter for further investigation at Police Station Batiagarh, District Damoh (M.P.) where the merg was registered under Section 174 of Cr.P.C. which is inquired by SDOP Batiagarh.

3. The SDOP recorded the statement of witnesses,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top