SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3136

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Avinash Pandey – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Arunodaya Singh,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH

th

ON THE 13 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 4646 of 2024 AVINASH PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Arunodaya Singh - Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Pramod Choubey - Government Advocate for the respondent No.1/State.

ORDER Heard on admission.

2. The revision is admitted for final hearing.

3. Learned Government Advocate submits that victim is served.

4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, revision is heard finally.

5. This revision is filed being aggrieved of the order dated 28/08/2024 and 03/09/2024 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) Sirmour District Rewa in Special Case No.64/2020 whereby an application filed by the applicant under Section 91 & 233 of Cr.P.C. for calling the defence witnesses was dismissed and the case was fixed for final arguments.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that learned trial Court vide order dated 03/09/2024, which was the second application filed basically for the same purpose under Sections 256 & 94 of BNSS has been dismissed and referred to the order of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top