SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3151

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Anamika Dev – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
D.P.Singh,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHISH SHROTI

th

ON THE 13 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 9675 of 2022 SMT. ANAMIKA DEV Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri D.P. Singh- learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Dharmendra Nayak - learned Government Advocate for the respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming benefit of encashment of earned leave after her retirement. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was working in work-charged establishment of the respondent- Public Works Department and was posted in the office of respondent no.4. She retired from service in the year 2021. After her retirement, she raised the claim for payment of leave encashment and when the same was not considered, the present writ petition was filed.

2. The petitioner has placed reliance upon the order passed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.470/2012. However, the said decision of the Division Bench was subsequently reviewed vide order dated 21/07/2014 in R.P. No.506/2012 (Shyama Bai Vs. State of M.P.). The Division Bench has held as under:-

"Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned Government Advocate

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top