SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3156

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt.Sanno Bai – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Ku. Choudhari – Respondent


Advocates:
,Vk.Trivedi[2]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL th ON THE 13 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 3246 of 2008 SANT RAM AND ANOTHER Versus VIJAY KU. CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 3248 of 2008 SMT. SANNO BAI AND ANOTHER Versus VIJAY KU. CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Vivek Baderiya - Advocate for the appellants.

Shri V.K Trivedi - Advocate for respondent No.2/Insurance company.

ORDER The present appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been preferred by the appellants/claimants assailing the award dated 14.03.2008 passed in M.C.C No.57/2007 and 58/2007 by the First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, District Seoni (M.P.). By the said award, the learned Tribunal partly allowed the claim petitions and granted compensation to the tune of Rs.3,74,500/- along with the interest of 6% per annum.

2. M.A No. 3246 of 2008 has been filed by the appellants who are the parents of the deceased, Jitesh Tekaam, who died in a motor vehicle accident on

17.02.2007. At the time of accident, he was bachelor aged 26 years.

3. M.A No. 3248 of 2008 has been filed by the appellants who are wife and son of the dece

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top