SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3162

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Choudhary Munnalal Jain – Appellant
Versus
Geetesh Alias Jitesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Santosh Anand,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 12 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 CIVIL REVISION No. 877 of 2024 CHOUDHARY MUNNALAL JAIN Versus GEETESH ALIAS JITESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Santosh Anand - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Manoj Jha Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State.

ORDER The present revision has been filed arising out of the order dated

31.07.2024 passed by the trial court whereby the application of the petitioner/plaintiff under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been rejected.

2. The aforesaid application was filed on various grounds, including on the ground that the plaint as it is filed does not disclose any valid cause of action because the suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking partition during the lifetime of their father in the property which even as per the plaintiff assertions is said to be succeeded by their father from their grandfather and a sale deed executed by the defendant No. 1 who is father of the plaintiff in favour of the present defendants No. 2 and 3.

3. The necessary facts for the purpose of disposal of the present petition are that the suit has been filed by the plaintiffs who are brothers and sisters challen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top